Who will CRISPR benefit? How to prevent this life-saving technology from creating gender and geographical disparities

Screen Shot at PM

From cancer to malaria to HIV, CRISPR is set to open up all kinds of dramatic breakthroughs in medicine, as well as agriculture. But who gets to wield this exciting new gene-editing tool, and who will benefit from the outcomes? Systems biologist and TED Fellow Geoffrey Siwo — who works at the Eck Institute of Global Health at the University of Notre Dame — wants to make sure that this emerging technology gets an equitable start. Last week, Siwo published new research that he hopes will address and prevent gender, geographical and other disparities in CRISPR research.

Here, Siwo shares some of the disparities that his new paper highlights and tells us why it’s so important to start making genome-editing research more accessible to all.

Related article:  Video: What makes opioids so addictive

The first are regional disparities: institutions in the US and China are leading in terms of publications on genome-editing technologies.

Some published papers are not open access — problematic because if only those who can read these are those who can afford them, it affects who ends up developing the technology.

It’s important to keep in mind, too, that CRISPR and other emerging technologies are being developed so quickly that any disparity that exists at their outset will be greatly amplified within a short period of time.

Read full, original post: Let’s design CRISPR to benefit everyone while we still can

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
can you boost your immune system to prevent coronavirus spread x

Video: How to boost your immune system to guard against COVID and other illnesses

Scientists have recently developed ways to measure your immune age. Fortunately, it turns out your immune age can go down ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend