Trust in science is cratering in America. Is there a way to restore it?

Credit: Harvard
Credit: Harvard

Although public trust in science is a recent preoccupation for some, it has been a problem for decades in the United States. Republicans began to trust science less after the COVID-19 pandemic, but marginalized communities … have long questioned whether the research enterprise is really working to improve their lives. … A particular area of concern is that emerging technologies don’t adequately address public needs despite the time, resources, and brainpower that scientists and engineers dedicate to developing them.

What if … university-based scientists and engineers tried to repair public trust by adopting a more inclusive understanding of technological innovation itself? Nowadays, we tend to focus on new, high-tech, transformative, and material interventions. But what if we adopted a more expansive approach that takes low-tech and even incremental solutions seriously …?

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

University scientists and engineers are understandably horrified by the recent damage to the US research and innovation ecosystem and the relative public silence on the matter. But we can resist our reputations as elitist, out of touch, and working against public interests by adopting a broader definition of technological innovation ….

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
Screenshot-2026-06-26-at-10.14.50-AM
Viewpoint: The facts behind the grifter-promoting wellness and anti-aging peptide craze: Don’t waste your money
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.