Evidence of life on Mars? NASA may have accidentally destroyed it in the 1970s

Evidence of life on Mars? NASA may have accidentally destroyed it in the 1970s
Credit: Unsplash/ NASA

In the mid-1970s, NASA sent two Viking landers to the surface of Mars equipped with instruments that conducted the only life detection experiments ever conducted on another planet. The results of those tests were very confusing at the time and remain so today. While some of them — particularly the labelled release experiment (which tested for microbial metabolism) and the pyrolytic release experiments (which tested for organic synthesis) — were initially positive for life, the gas exchange experiment was not.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

At the time of those landings, scientists had very little understanding of the Martian environment. Since Earth is a water planet, it seemed reasonable that adding water might coax life to show itself in the extremely dry Martian environment.

…

Now let’s ask what would happen if you poured water over these dry-adapted microbes. Might that overwhelm them? In technical terms, we would say that we were hyperhydrating them, but in simple terms, it would be more like drowning them. It would be as if an alien spaceship were to find you wandering half-dead in the desert, and your would-be saviors decide, “Humans need water. Let’s put the human in the middle of the ocean to save it!” That wouldn’t work either.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Open-Menthol-Cigarette-Pack
How the tobacco industry conspired with conservative activists to kill the Biden administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettes 
Caution-Taped-Fresh-Produce-Aisle
Should we be afraid of our food?
Profile and Vaccination Portraits
Convinced COVID shots cause widespread harm, Kennedy plans federal initiative to incentivize doctors to report alleged injuries
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-12.18.57-PM
5 deaths, 1,000 reported cases: These horrific numbers underestimate the consequences of the anti-vax movement
Cross and Syringe Standoff
Viewpoint: Hijacking Jesus: How anti-vaccine fanatics are exploiting religious exemptions and killing children
Screenshot-2026-10-11-at-10.24.21-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s new CDC head Erica Schwartz greenlights hepatitis B vaccine study critics call “unethical and designed to cast doubts on its safety”
Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 12.25
Tearful onions? CRISPR has a solution for that
Screenshot-2026-10-05-at-11.57.44-AM
Scaremongering or legitimate safety concerns? The political dogfight over America’s food safety system
Personalized-Cancer-mRNA-Vaccine-Vial
Personalized mRNA vaccines are poised to revolutionize cancer treatments. Here are the barriers.
Deepfake Democracy Media Mosaic
31 states have passed a patchwork of laws to limit election deepfake commercials. They’re not working very well.
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.