Stepping out of the shadows: UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization voices stronger support for crop biotechnology

Screenshot 2025-07-24 at 11.37.04 AM

While many private firms, research institutions and public agencies have been very active in communicating the benefits of agricultural biotechnology over the past 25 years, the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] has been marginally engaged at best.

In 2004, the FAO released its State of Agriculture Report, which focused on agricultural biotechnology and what technology could provide to the food insecure.

The organization received a lot of criticism from activist environmental organizations for supporting ag biotech and subsequently pulled back on events and initiatives in this space.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

After 20 years of relative inactivity on the ag biotech file, … the FAO announced in early 2025 that it was organizing a conference on agricultural and food biotechnology, including gene editing technologies.

[The] conference brought together a wide representation of farmers, scientists, academics, government representatives and non-governmental organization representatives, many from the Global South.

Informative sessions were held on topics ranging from ag biotech’s contributions to improving food system sustainability to how biotech innovations will contribute to improvements in crop production, livestock production, forestry and aquaculture.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science
Screenshot-2026-06-26-at-10.14.50-AM
Viewpoint: The facts behind the grifter-promoting wellness and anti-aging peptide craze: Don’t waste your money
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-01_21_33-PM
How the dubious, Trump-backed, addictive drug kratom could enrich cabinet secretary Markwayne Mullin
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-11.18.03-AM
Viewpoint: Appreciating a simpler past without swallowing the misleading ‘nature is healthier and safer’ myth
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-12_10_16-PM
Europe’s heat wave fueled recycled climate-denial narratives and harassment of climate scientists
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-1.48.40-PM
Glyphosate affirmed as safe: Supreme Court rejects lawsuit claiming Roundup herbicide causes cancer, upholding EPA determination
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-11_34_33-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s vaccine subterfuge campaign now flies below the media radar
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-10_52_43-AM
Anguished parents, doctors in tears: Utah’s long measles outbreak takes a toll
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-01_12_57-PM
After Mel Gibson’s Joe Rogan comments, grifters promoting ivermectin, without evidence, as a hantavirus preventive 
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-03_12_23-PM
Is cellular reprogramming junk science? Nearly 20 patients are getting eye injections in the first FDA-cleared cellular trial
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.