Using…CRISPR-Cas9…does not require a high level of scientific knowledge, raising concerns that malicious “biohackers” or careless enthusiasts might create something potentially harmful.
The issue was raised in…a major investigation of gene editing by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, an independent body that explores ethical questions raised by advances in biology and medicine.
In its review, the Nuffield Council pointed out that the “comparatively low cost, ease of use and availability” of online gene editing kits meant they were accessible to unregulated amateur users.
…
Hugh Whittall, director of the Nuffield Council for Bioethics, said: “There is no evidence that we’ve seen that there are people with things going on in their garages, but … this is one of the things that we need to be aware of, be conscious of the possibility.
…
Related on the SLP
Dr Greenfield was most concerned about “frivolous” use of CRSPR-Cas9 gene editing.
“We don’t really want to encourage frivolous cosmetic uses of a powerful technology when we have real needs right now,” he said.
He added: “I don’t worry about the monsters.”
The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Amateur scientists’ access to gene editing technology raises concerns
