Is life a ‘cosmic accident’ or do humans have a higher purpose?

| | August 9, 2017

Does humanity exist to serve some ultimate, transcendent purpose? Conventional scientific wisdom gives the answer as a definitive no.

According to [physicist Lawrence Krauss], the fact that we evolved on this planet is just a “cosmic accident”, and people who believe otherwise are probably suffering from some kind of religious delusion.

[Physicist] Lee Smolin’s theory of cosmological natural selection, which he first proposed in 1992 and presented most fully in his book The Life of the Cosmos [focuses] on the idea that our universe exists as just one in a vast population of replicating universes: a multiverse (this idea is becoming increasingly conventional and non-controversial among physicists). In a multiverse, Smolin reasoned, universe designs that were better at self-replication would achieve greater representation. And if black holes were the mechanism of self-replication, he reasoned further, then selection would favor universes that contained more black holes. From this perspective, life is merely the accidental by-product of processes ‘designed’ by cosmological natural selection to produce black holes.

RELATED ARTICLE:  Humans struggle to identify odors despite acute sense of smell

The bottom line [..] is: life is more likely than black holes (or anything else) to be a mechanism of universe replication.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Does Science Really Say There’s No Purpose to Life?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.


News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.

Send this to a friend