FDA releases guidelines to fast-track new generation of fast-acting antidepressants

esketamine png

As companies race to develop fast-acting antidepressants, they are grappling with how to design clinical trials for a type of drug that doesn’t yet exist.

There’s no shortage of interest in the idea: Janssen (JNJ) is testing an esketamine nasal spray, which, when combined with an oral antidepressant, has shown promise in quickly curbing symptoms of serious depression.

Late last month, the FDA stepped in to offer some help. The agency released a draft guidance on developing new treatments for major depressive disorder that lays out the special considerations for clinical trials on rapid-acting antidepressants.

Current trial designs assume it’ll take four to eight weeks for a drug to kick in. But fast-acting antidepressants should, in theory, start working much sooner.

Related article:  Esketamine touted as 'game changer' for depression—but who gets to use it?

[T]he FDA said drug makers need to show that the drugs work within a week. And in the case of drugs that seem to work particularly quickly, an appropriate endpoint might be just hours after the first dose.

There’s also a question of determining the right dose — or doses. The FDA said it’s particularly interested in studies that test whether a lower dose of the drug than what’s needed for short-term efficacy can maintain the treatment response in the long run.

The new guidance offers drug companies insight into how the agency is thinking about this potentially new class of drugs.

Read full, original post: Companies are racing to develop fast-acting depression drugs — but the process is tricky

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend