FDA releases guidelines to fast-track new generation of fast-acting antidepressants

esketamine png

As companies race to develop fast-acting antidepressants, they are grappling with how to design clinical trials for a type of drug that doesn’t yet exist.

There’s no shortage of interest in the idea: Janssen (JNJ) is testing an esketamine nasal spray, which, when combined with an oral antidepressant, has shown promise in quickly curbing symptoms of serious depression.

Late last month, the FDA stepped in to offer some help. The agency released a draft guidance on developing new treatments for major depressive disorder that lays out the special considerations for clinical trials on rapid-acting antidepressants.

Current trial designs assume it’ll take four to eight weeks for a drug to kick in. But fast-acting antidepressants should, in theory, start working much sooner.

[T]he FDA said drug makers need to show that the drugs work within a week. And in the case of drugs that seem to work particularly quickly, an appropriate endpoint might be just hours after the first dose.

There’s also a question of determining the right dose — or doses. The FDA said it’s particularly interested in studies that test whether a lower dose of the drug than what’s needed for short-term efficacy can maintain the treatment response in the long run.

The new guidance offers drug companies insight into how the agency is thinking about this potentially new class of drugs.

Read full, original post: Companies are racing to develop fast-acting depression drugs — but the process is tricky

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Misinformation alert: No, glyphosate use in Canadian forests is not spurring more wildfires
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-11.32.12-AM
Viewpoint: Trump appoints climate change hoax promoter to head influential government policy project
Screenshot 2026-07-16 at 8.49
Pete Hegseth’s bizarre Viagra commercial as Trump administration endorses ‘hormone replacement therapy’

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.