Some African scientists fear the continent will be left behind as gene editing transforms food production

Credit: Chelsea Watson
Credit: Chelsea Watson

Scientists in Africa are calling on their governments to ensure the continent isn’t left behind as gene editing revolutionizes food production.

Gene editing is a good tool that can help enhance Africa’s food security, say scientists across the continent, and it shouldn’t suffer the same fate that has stymied the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) over the last three decades.

As GMOs continue to face regulatory barriers that are hampering their acceptance across the continent, scientists are convinced that gene editing offers a new frontier for introducing advanced technology to tackle food security issues in Africa.

“Very soon, GMOs may be forgotten,” Prof. Walter Alhassan, retired director deneral of Ghana’s Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, told the Alliance for Science. “Now we have new breeding techniques [with] gene editing.  This technology is moving, and Ghana should not be left behind.”

“We hope our government will put money into science,” Alhassan added. “That is how the nation will develop. COVID-19 has been a rude awakening… Without science, we cannot develop… We are all ready to move ahead with the technology, but our governments must put their money where their mouth is.”

Dr. Chiedozie Egesi, senior scientist at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in Nigeria, said that gene editing technology can help make African crops more resilient, more productive and more nutritious if applied appropriately.

“We need technologies such as gene editing to increase our productivity, enhance the nutrition status of our crops and make them more resilient to climate change and a pandemic environment,” Egesi said. “For example, we have seen promising landmark research for virus resistance in banana and cassava, pest resistance [against] the fall armyworm in maize and better nutrition, like less cyanide in cassava and high iron and zinc in cassava, among others.”

Zimbabwean scientist Nyasha Mudukuti, who earned a master’s degree in plant breeding and genetics, agrees. “I’ve had the firsthand experience of working on gene editing of crops and plants that are of importance to us as human beings,” she said. “So, it’s something that I can tell you that we have the science that backs it up. It’s safe to use.”

Mudukuti said governments need to make existing policies more flexible, or enact new enabling polices, “so that farmers can adopt this if they want to. Let the farmer make a choice for him or themselves about whether or not to use this technology.”

Gene editing (also referred to as genome editing) is a set of molecular biology techniques that allow scientists to delete and silence specific genes, or otherwise manipulate the genomes of living organisms, to address productivity challenges in agriculture.

CRISPR is of the most popular editing techniques. CRISPR, or Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, refers to treating specialized DNA stretches with an associated enzyme, Cas9, which works like a pair of molecular scissors capable of cutting DNA strands and editing the genes to suit specific purposes.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on agricultural biotech and biomedicine? Subscribe to our newsletter.

In humans, CRISPR has the potential to stop the perpetuation of diseases. In plants, it has the potential to help them use nitrogen and water more efficiently, accelerate the photosynthesis process, provide more nutrients, resist insects and diseases, tolerate increased soil salinity and otherwise thrive in an erratic climate.

Related article:  Taming wild plants with CRISPR gene editing in quest to find new foods

Some research has been ongoing in Africa using the technology to improve crops and animals, although no product is on the market yet. The Kenya Agriculture and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) and two other international organizations are using CRISPR-Cas9 technology to improve maize germplasm so it becomes resistant to maize lethal necrosis. The devastating viral disease reduced maize yields in Kenya by an average of 22 percent in 2013, forcing many farmers to abandon the crop entirely.

A team of scientists from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has used CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing to inactivate the endogenous streak virus, a plant disease, and develop virus-resistant banana varieties.

Using CRISPR, the Innovative Genomics Institute is undertaking research to produce cocoa varieties that can withstand warmer conditions, as well as resist viral and fungal diseases.

Gene editing has a number of advantages. This includes the ability to apply it in a very targeted manner to introduce small genetic changes that can have potentially significant impacts, such as conferring crops with tolerance to various plant diseases. Additionally, it has the advantage of being easily applicable to orphan crops, which are often indigenous staple foods. Until now, they have largely been ignored by plant breeders because of their low economic significance.

There are, however, some constraints to the application of the gene editing technology, including the prospect of over-regulation if African policy makers decide to treat gene edited crops like GMOs.

A lack of solid infrastructure for novel scientific research has been a challenge to adopting improved technologies like gene editing on the continent, Egesi observed. “We make efforts to train African scientists in some of the finest research centers in the world but often times the scientists get disillusioned on returning home to poor funding, poor [electrical] power to sustain a lab, and sometimes, no lab at all,” he explained.

“Misinformation and perceived risks or dangers of growing crops derived from improved technologies has played a key role in demotivating policy makers and development planners from making a big case for investment in science and technology,” he added.

Advocacy at all levels, including government and non-government spheres, is crucial to help overcome some of these challenges, Egesi noted. He called for continuing investment in science and technology, including building a talent pipeline for young scientists to bridge the already existing gaps. The value of using new plant breeding technologies to improve crop production must be demonstrated to convince people of its efficacy, he said, and African governments need to award competitive grants so scientists can access and invest in these new technologies.

Joseph Opoku Gakpo is a 2016 Cornell Alliance for Science Global Leadership Fellow and contributes to the Multimedia Group Limited in Ghana, working with Joy FM, Joy News TV, and MyJoyOnline. He has a master’s degree in communications studies from the University of Ghana and is a member of the Ghana Journalists Association. Find Joseph on Twitter @josephopoku1990

A version of this article was originally posted at the Cornell Alliance for Science website and has been reposted here with permission. The Cornell Alliance for Science can be found on Twitter @ScienceAlly

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend