Viewpoint: EU’s Farm-to-Fork policy inevitably means plowing rainforests to meet Europe’s expanding food needs

There just isn't enough land without inputs and plant breeding. Credit: Andrea Ucini
There just isn't enough land without inputs and plant breeding. Credit: Andrea Ucini

Meet the European Union’s Farm to Fork Strategy. Considered the EU’s Green New Deal, the strategy’s goal is to make the continent carbon neutral by 2050. The plan comes with lofty goals, including the reduction of pesticide use by 50 percent and of fertilizer use by 20 percent. It also calls for farmers to remove 10 percent of farmland out of production, and transition a quarter of fields to organic production.

Farm to Fork’s goals all lead to one thing: lower food production. Based on its own analysis, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service believes the strategy will reduce European agricultural production between 7 and 12 percent. There’s no question cutting inputs decreases yields, as does organic agriculture.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

And that’s the grand irony of Farm to Fork: It’s just a sleight of hand. The EU isn’t actually going carbon neutral; it’s just exporting its carbon emissions to other parts of the world. Unfortunately, that likely means we’ll continue to lose rainforests, despite the fact that they play such a pivotal role in regulating Earth’s climate.

…

But as long as environmental activists continue to fight against productional advancements, we’ll see additional environmental degradation. It’s time to abandon those backward perspectives and start looking to a more sustainable future.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
Screenshot-2026-10-21-at-11.30.51-AM
Viewpoint: Yes, our food system stinks, but the attack of ultra-processed foods is often misplaced
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-11.36.40-AM
An Earth-saving benefit of global warming?: How fossil fuel-burning humans stopped the looming Ice Age
Neon Syringe Portrait with BPC-157
Viewpoint: Peptides and medical freedom: The MAHA obsession that can damage your health
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Robots in a Futuristic Conference Meeting
Helpful until we’re helpless? Researchers warn AI is gradually eroding human control
Screenshot-2026-10-30-at-11.20.30-AM
‘Silent killer’: Hepatitis B could surge under Trump–RFK Jr. rollback of newborn vaccine recommendations
Patriotic Flag in a Glass Flask
Viewpoint: America Last: From the Pentagon to universities, Trump’s corruption of science could inflict lasting, irreversible damage on U.S. research
Screenshot 2026-07-29 at 10.40
The COVID vaccine turbo cancer scare is back. Science still proves it’s wrong.
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.