Companies make big bucks by making you afraid of chemicals

image

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Most people don’t realize that it’s virtually impossible to prove something completely safe. Instead, science tests for the lack of evidence of risk. A subtle but important distinction, this means that nothing, not even water, is completely safe at all doses and modes of exposure. . . . In essence, companies create a market for their products based on fear, not evidence. Here’s how:

Step 1: Plant the seeds of fear

An ancient and adaptive emotion ingrained in humanity through evolution, fear is one of the most powerful motivators of behavior. . .  In the developed world, we have far less to fear than our ancestors did, so our instincts latch on to not-so-hazardous “threats.” . . .

Step 2: Obscure the science

. . . These companies’ marketing campaigns have little to do with science and everything to do with inducing maximum fear. Bemoaning the evils of the chemicals other companies use, they provide little evidence about the safety of their own ingredients, often because that data does not exist. The goal is to keep their customers afraid of the competition while posing as the safe and caring alternative.

Co-opting the  language of science without adopting principles of science is a clever bait and switch.

Step 3: Profit

Once consumers are afraid and the science has been obscured, companies slap on a premium for their products based on vague claims about safety or even hazier concepts like “honesty” or “conscience.” Primed with fear, potential customers are ready to pay much more than they would for a mainstream brand. These fear-based marketing campaigns are not about educating consumers but creating an illusion of consumer empowerment.

Read full, original post: How Marketers Use Fear Of Chemicals For Profit: 3 Easy Steps

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-26-2026-12_46_16-PM
Viewpoint: The fake controversy over whether combining childhood vaccines is dangerous— a debate science resolved 25 years ago
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-10_32_46-AM
There has been a slew of recent reports of food recalls and foodborne outbreaks. Do we face an escalating problem?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-01_44_53-PM
Viewpoint: Why medical and health nonsense spreads so casually on pop culture media
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-18-2026-01_38_09-PM
Microsoft exec: AI is a ‘doom loop’ scraping the ‘largest theft of labor in human history'
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-12.00.30-PM
Investigative group ProPublica finds links between ectopic pregnancy deaths and abortion bans
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-03_41_02-PM
Viewpoint: Does IQ really measure intelligence? BBC gets it wrong.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-11_47_32-AM
Facing pressure from Trump administration, fewer hospitals offer medical treatment for transgender minors
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-3.14.20-PM
19%: Plunging support for Trump-RFK, Jr. measles vaccine safety oversight
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-11_03_54-AM-2
AI sparks a bioweapons race
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-02_35_25-PM
22-year frozen embryo: In one of the longest delayed births ever, middle-aged Greek couple gives birth to a daughter
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.