When did pre-modern humans begin using fire?

Credit: GraphicaArtis/Corbis
Credit: GraphicaArtis/Corbis

Circumstantial evidence suggests that archaic humans’ ability to cook food and consume more calories may have played a pivotal role in the development of much bigger brains as far back as Homo erectus more than a million years ago. But hard evidence for when exactly our ancestors fully wielded control of flames has proved elusive. A novel application of a trusty geochemical technique may help answer burning questions about when and where our ancestors made friends with fire.

[Paleoecologist Kevin] Uno and colleagues turned to a class of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a type of aromatic hydrocarbon that is produced when oil, gas, or wood is burned.

The team’s preliminary findings show elevated PAH concentrations around archaeological sites, whereas soil samples from nearby locations that show no signs of human habitation have lower PAHs—indicating that the fires were contained, not landscape-wide.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.
[This] fits neatly into the timeline for the earliest human use of fire, [anthropologist Richard] Wrangham said. Skeletal changes evident in the fossil record—a shortened gut, smaller abdominal cavity, and larger brains—suggest that archaic humans became obligatorily connected to fire around 1.9 million years ago. “The period this team is investigating is the period in which I would expect to see close associations between human settlements and fire.”

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
AI data centers and water usage: It’s a genuine and growing problem
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-16-2026-11_28_54-AM
Viewpoint: Study links childhood vaccination to autism!!! Here’s how anti-vaxxers twist evidence to corrupt science
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-10_18_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: Is corporate embrace of regenerative agriculture greenwashing?
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-3.14.20-PM
19%: Plunging support for Trump-RFK, Jr. measles vaccine safety oversight
Screenshot-2026-09-18-at-11.35.25-AM
RFK Jr.’s latest crank obsession: Protecting Americans from perfectly safe electromagnetic radiation
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-09_47_55-AM
Trump says he’ll require drugmakers to end multiple vaccine doses, reviving discredited autism claims
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-01_44_53-PM
Viewpoint: Why medical and health nonsense spreads so casually on pop culture media
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-4.31.28-PM
White House drafting executive order to control what OMB Director Vought claims are “woke” NIH science grants
Screenshot 2026-09-18 at 10.26
Slowdown AI development? China acknowledges serious risks but sees warnings as U.S. ploy to control the technology
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.